Naar inhoud
Mystery

Life

2017 R 1h 44m 6.5 (8K)
Je gratis film- & serietracker

Raak nooit meer kwijt wat je aan het kijken bent.

Al je films en series op één plek. Ga verder waar je gebleven was en weet altijd wat je hierna kunt kijken.

Met
Jake Gyllenhaal Ryan Reynolds Rebecca Ferguson Hiroyuki Sanada Olga Dihovichnaya

2,337 kijkers houden dit bij op Moventra ·gratis om mee te doen

Regisseur
Daniel Espinosa
Schrijvers
Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick
Sterren
Jake Gyllenhaal, Ryan Reynolds, Rebecca Ferguson
Genre
Mystery, Science Fiction, Horror

Verhaal

Zes leden van het International Space Station staan op het punt een van de grootste ontdekkingen te doen in de geschiedenis van de mensheid; het eerste bewijs van buitenaards leven op Mars. Wanneer de bemanning bezig is met onderzoek blijken hun methoden onvoorziene consequenties te hebben.

Tagline
Be careful what you search for.
Genre
Mystery, Science Fiction, Horror
Beoordeling
R
Studio's
Columbia Pictures, Skydance Media
Uitgebracht
2017
Talen
Engels

Cast

Reviews

7 recensies
AstroNoud

AstroNoud

15 jan. 2022 · via TMDb

7.0

If you can ignore some plot-gaps, the sci-fi horror ‘Life’ will keep you on the edge of your seat until its very ending – accompanied by a haunting score. 7/10

Rangan

Rangan

13 jul. 2017 · via TMDb

7.0

**Their historic discovery was not celebratable.** As I mentioned many times before, now is the trend of the space exploration in films. So there were many films like this one, but not all of them are received well. It was a decent flick, if you consider from the real world aspect, but definitely a very nice entertainer. Very tense plot, especially in the second half till the final scene. This is a minimal cast film and the entire story takes place in an Internation Space Station in the Earth orbit with a lab facility. They've come from Mars with a soil sample to study for any sign of life. Their historic discovery does not become a happy event as they encounter life threatening trouble on-board. The remaining is to focus their rest of the mission that how it'll end. This is the second film with the same name I've seen in the recent time. The other one was a biographical-drama starring Robert Pattison, but this is an sci-fi-thriller. Lots of big names in it, but the film did not make that kind of a big buzz. It was considered a good fictional space film. Kind of inspired by other similar themed flicks. Lots of thrills, fast paced narration, a simple story with the nice visuals. From the Swedish director of 'Easy Money' fame. There were lots of speculations about its connection with other films. But nothing was confirmed by the filmmakers. I hope there will be a sequel, but this time it won't be same as the story might take place in a different setting. Overall, I enjoyed it and surely would suggest it if anybody asks me. _7/10_

John Chard

John Chard

19 sep. 2017 · via TMDb

6.0

It's life, Jim, but actually as we know it. Life is an average sci-fi picture, one that gets by on effects and general sci-fi values. Plot is utterly familiar. OK! It's always going to be unfair to judge a film of this type by the bar raiser that was Ridley Scott's Alien (1979), but really the familiarity on show here is tantamount to being naughty. A group of space explorers discover an alien life form and after the initial wonderment and excitement subsides, things quickly turn bad, with the potential for threat to mankind as we know it... That's pretty much it, really, the cast go through the motions of being in a play that is basically the characters being picked off by an alien manta ray thingy. Standard formula takes a grip of the viewer, who will be killed? who is next? will anyone survive? and etc. The makers - just to continue the unadventurous theme - throw in a Deep Blue Sea moment, while Hiroyuki Sanada has wandered in off of Sunshine's Icarrus II to feature aboard the International Space Station. The ending has and will infuriate many, but personally I liked it, very much from The Twilight Zone dimension, to which it lifts the piece just above averageville. Not recommended with any conviction, especially to sci-fi fans stung by serious science defects and logic holes, while casual sci-fiers would be better off with the brilliance of Alien or something more fun packed and unpretentious like Leviathan (1989). But as it is it's a decent enough time waster. 6/10

Ruuz

Ruuz

10 jun. 2017 · via TMDb

6.0

_Life_ may not be doing anything new, but it's doing it better than similar services of late. _Final rating:★★★ - I personally recommend you give it a go._

5rJoud

5rJoud

4 jul. 2021 · via TMDb

5.0

**Yes, okay.** Boring characters, wasted superstars on a meaningless script, huge Alien rip-off which didn't work, an almost Marvel-style hologram on the ISS, laughable. Everything is so bad in this movie, except for the production value. We see gorgeous floating in zero-g, a sweet looking alien and easy on the eye actors. The boring story is not as boring as it would have been if the budget was low. Still, some major flaws in story-telling make this an average flick. The pretty alien does not look scary at all. The characters are not introduced properly. The whole plot is disjointed, we get the facts of the story served without any sense of purpose. Finally there is no immersion, life on the ISS is as alien as the creature without weaknesses, for which you will be rooting half-way through this film. 3 June 2017 I am migrating my reviews from a different site which has become simply garbage. TMDB looks awesome and I look forward to be a part of it.

mbirth

mbirth

26 aug. 2017 · via TMDb

4.0

_"Monkeys in Space"_ would be a better title for this flick. As with all bad horror movies, the horror only exists because of people ignoring even the simplest rules or just not talking to each other. Add various logic errors to it and you have _"Life"_. **⚠ SPOILERS AHEAD ⚠** Things turn stupid when they start to experiment with that unknown life-form in a lab not suited for that at all. And they don't use remote controlled robot-arms but simple rubber gloves. The life-form, of course, instinctively knows how to use tools and how to penetrate rubber. It then flees through a CO₂ nozzle (after an empty! flamethrower still had its pilot flame on and triggered the fire alarm) and doesn't end up in some tank but no, somehow gets into the rest of the space station. And this was only possible, because the computer to close the nozzles is a 1950s pocket calculator and you have to close them one by one by entering a 20-digit ID for each one or so it seems. The story is driven by people knowingly opening hatches that should've been kept closed. Or not talking to each other, like telling the others that the creature is currently nibbling at one's leg. Another highlight is the creature, finally trapped outside the station, finding its way back in THROUGH THE EFFING THRUSTERS. Why they seem to be connected to the inside of the space station is beyond me. Same applies to 2 guys venting all air from a (sealed) module, but a 3rd guy opening the hatch from a pressurised area to said module without any indication the module was without pressure. (And, of course, he didn't know anything about the creature being trapped there, because he threw away his comm device the moment it had a bit of reception issues earlier.) The whole movie is so wrong, I almost had to laugh. Especially, when the last survivors escape in 2 separate escape pods and the one which should reach Earth gets hit by debris and flies into outer space and the other one, *trying* to get away from Earth is kept from doing that by the creature who suddenly seemed to have acquired knowledge about steering NASA issue escape pods and is keeping the human from altering the course. The torture ends with some Asian fishermen simply opening the hatch of the space capsule that just landed in front of them. Although they can clearly see the astronaut trapped in some spiderweb-like goo inside. It was like a final insult to sanity and reason.

007ace

007ace

19 jun. 2017 · via TMDb

**Unexpected horror** <br> I was expecting so.ething watered down and similar to most new 'no escape' sci-fi movies. This was a great change, it felt more like alien; dark, gritty, serious.<br>You could spend hours picking things apart but it is enjoyable and I think that outweighs most of those faults.

Beoordeling

6.5

Votes

8K

Popularity

19

Foto's

Stills en key art van de film

Jouw gratis film- & serietracker

Wat is Moventra?

Moventra onthoudt wat je kijkt, zodat jij dat niet hoeft. Houd een watchlist bij, log afleveringen en ontdek vergelijkbare titels — gratis.

Voor altijd gratis Nooit reclame Films & series in één app Op al je apparaten

Watchlist

Bewaar films en series die je later wilt kijken.

Afleveringen volgen

Houd elk seizoen en elke aflevering bij terwijl je kijkt.

Aanbevelingen

Vind vergelijkbare titels als iets niets voor je is.

Im- & export

Neem je lijst mee en houd zelf de controle over je gegevens.

Veelgestelde vragen

Hoe voeg ik Life toe aan mijn bibliotheek?
Maak een gratis account en tik op “Wil ik kijken” bij Life. Daarna kun je het op kijkend, gezien of favoriet zetten.
Kan ik Life beoordelen en recenseren?
Ja — als je bent ingelogd kun je Life beoordelen, een recensie achterlaten en alles terugzien wat je hebt gekeken.
Waar vind ik meer films zoals Life?
Scroll naar de aanbevelingen op deze pagina, of open je dashboard voor suggesties op maat.
Zijn mijn Moventra-gegevens privé?
Je gegevens zijn van jou. Moventra is gratis en reclamevrij, en je kunt je bibliotheek altijd exporteren of verwijderen.

Je watchlist, je voortgang, je Life. Allemaal in één gratis app.

Voor altijd gratis, geen reclame. Ga verder waar je gebleven was en weet altijd wat er hierna komt.